Artw 01:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC) The term "web 3.0" does exist, but since it has no meaning that I can glean apart from "semantic web", it should be a redirect. I beleive that this should have a disambiguation page rather than an alias to the semantic web entry - the disambiguation page should link to Web 2.0, Semantic Web, and whatever else you think ought to be there.Ĭome back when it meets WP:NEO. In addition at the recent Web 2.0 conference in SF many companies gave presentations that used the term. You may not like the term, but to accurately reflect what people are talking about, it should be represented. It would appear the wikipedia staff is revealing an editorial bias in not having a page about this term. Also see this link: charting the history of the term. Do a Google search on it and you will see. I think the term has been used widely in fact. I think that the most appropriate action, if any, is to redirect this to Semantic Web.
Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.18.178.163 ( talk Since even the New York times refers to "Web 3.0" it may not be a bad idea to create a corresponding article (see NY Times article). Its a 'media wank' term -Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.33.71.34 ( talk) 17:27, 20 March 2008 (UTC) Good - then by that measure some people might not know what it means, so let's define it here.
0 kommentar(er)
